Showing posts with label information literacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label information literacy. Show all posts

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Teaching Infographics - Teaching Reading


infographics classi
#1 I have to critically think in college, but your tests don’t teach me that. (20 things students want the nation to know about education)

When I was in the edtech world, a major check-point on my peer rating system was appreciation of Edwin Tufte's infographics tetralogy (Envisioning Information, Visual Explanations, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Beautiful Evidence).  If I saw his texts on an office shelf, I was immediately hooked by that office holder. If an edtech teacher knew of Tufte's short text The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching out Corrupts Within (which demonstrates that a poor PPt presentation failed to prevent the Columbia disaster), I knew that this educator knew her stuff. These are brilliant studies of visual information across global time and place.

Not being a particularly visual learner, I knew immediately when I met Tufte's 1st book that I had much to learn. 

No, our students should not be thrown to Tufte.  But they must be thrown to his legacy. When what I taught was called Literacy, I always included a discrete infographics unit. I also included infographics in pre and post reading activities for informational text - sometimes even for fiction text (historical and international fiction, for example).

I am a fan of embedding visual text into reading standards. 

What is an infographic?  Wikipedia has the definition used by every how-to I have found: "graphic visual representations of information, data or knowledge. These graphics present complex information quickly and clearly."  

Infographics belong in ELA as texts because they require that students (quotes are from CCSS ELA Reading 6-12):
  • Identify text structures and their purposes
  • Read for detail - "Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it" 
  • "Determine central ideas or themes of a text"
  • "Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text"
  • "Summarize the key supporting details and ideas"
  • "Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse formats and media, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words"
  • "Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence"
  • Think critically
  • Ask questions
  • Identify purpose and audience
  • Problem-solve
I mined the net for a short video on "How to read an infographic" -  but there does not seem to be one.  This is the perfect flipped assignment for ELA. In fact, as discrete instruction goes, it is one of very few flipped lessons that will be successful or useful in an ELA classroom.

So I made my own flip-lesson video called Reading Infographics.  Find it on YouTube or look at it below.  One thing you might do with students is have them use the YouTube Annotate function to interact with the lesson and with each other.  I have embedded many activities/exercises into the resource than can be used this way or assigned for HW or classwork.

In the Middle School classroom, I made a Concept Wall containing the key concepts and vocabulary from this video.

[new:  Visual.ly is a terrific source for infographics.  It is not in the video.]

If you want a copy of the original Keynote, contact me.




Wednesday, October 5, 2011

10 Reasons Why Schools Need Librarians

Image source
I was searching for a book today. I wanted to add it to my personal booklist. I did not have a specific title in mind, but I had read a similar title in a the genre.  So I looked in four places: Amazon.com, Scholastic.com, a Google search, and the school's online catalog.  I needed to cross-reference all of these sources to find my book (Marie Rutkoski's Cabinet of Wonders).  A school that devalues its own library devalues the literacy education of the school itself. 

I am a librarian (MLS, Rutgers U, '72) as well as a teacher.  I know first hand that librarians are trained and educated and experienced in what they do.  But what, exactly, is the value of a certified librarian?  In no particular order...

  1. Librarians manage school knowledge collections and teach students and teachers how to use them in the 21st Century World.  No one else in a school has this training.  Librarians have a specialization that requires them to be knowledgeable about every content area in the school - and every content area that might be coming to the school.  No one else in the school has this overview.
  2. Librarians are avid readers. Show me a Literacy Specialist or teacher who has read as many 6-8th level/interest books as my school librarian and I will show you a librarian who jumped ship. 
  3. School librarians know that libraries are not all about books and literacy is not all about text.  I consider that a no-brainer, but for some administrators it must be a new idea.  For years the School Library Journal has been promoting the "media center" or "digital learning center" or just plain "learning place" as a library concept.  Not just promoting - doing lots of things to make this happen in schools all over the globe.  Libraries are learning places.
  4. School librarians are tech savvy. For years the school library was, in many districts and private schools, the only space with networked or Internet-connected computers, not to mention cameras and other multimedia production and play hardware. Librarians have been among the first to embrace ebooks and ebook readers, vast digital databases (Maine has MARVEL), and digital/audio/multimedia texts as reading choices.  School librarians are in the forefront of blogging about these texts. They highlight alternative text at workshops and conferences.  Sadly, schools often overlook this expertise when designing PD, especially in Literacy contexts.
  5. School librarians are creative users of information and creative interpreters of curriculum.  Teachers who take the time to ask the librarian to help design and guide a research unit learn this.  Librarians are not vested in the past and they are, by inclination and professionalism, aware of the new (the best and the worst).  They are especially creative when asked to differentiate.  Sadly, few teachers take advantage of this extra pair of eyes.
  6. School librarians are experts at information literacy and trained teachers of this important 21st century knowledge/skill set. Librarianship is about managing text and information so that it can be found, and then teaching users what to do with information once it has been found. The school librarian is a support system for every single person in the school who has an information need. She is the most qualified and skilled teacher of information literacy.  In many schools, she is also the steward of fair use and teacher-defender of citation.  This is a voice that matters.
  7. Every librarian is a literacy coach. Not only do school librarians know their collections and a vast array of online collections/sources, they know their students. They have the largest knowledge about tools to connect kid -> reading.  They believe choice reading, reading passions, reading habits, challenging reading and "just right" reading.  They build their collections to meet the needs of the population of the school.  And yes, librarians do know about leveled reading, Lexiles, F&P scores, etc.  They also know the limits of these labels - because students talk to them all the time about what they want to read.
  8. Librarians are experts at managing information - a huge job, even in a small school library. Librarians must make key decisions about management that are invisible to all other members of a school community.  Without them, books, web catalogs, database and other subscriptions, digital and paper resources, furnishings, literacy and instructional support materials, eBooks, media, etc. will not be effectively managed. Resources that are not managed are not available to the entire community equally and quickly.  This is the difference between a library and a literacy store room.  An important, also invisible, element of this management is the networking that librarians do - with local, state, and global librarian groups.  In fact, the librarian may be the most networked member of the school community.  They network for resource access and sharing, informational sharing, and idea sharing.  Librarians network for the school - not (like those few teachers who network) for themselves.
  9. Librarians are trained to select and prioritize.  They access and read evaluative reviews; they access and explore multiple sources of information at multiple levels.  By nature and training, they filter and collect.  This is the major service they provide to a school. Amazon.com and internet searching can not begin to provide students and teachers with the range of preselected sources that are found in a well-constructed and well-maintained library catalog or,  increasingly, a well-designed website to support and guide a research project.  Librarians have time and make time for the legwork that is required for a well-designed student unit.  This is a librarian's passion.
  10. Librarians are curious, questioning (even skeptical), and insatiable.  They are, at heart, students.  In fact, they are the model product of a 21st century education.  

So why are schools replacing certified Librarians with aides?  Why do so many principals and superintendents see this job as menial and under-professional?  This is wrong.  End of story.

Thursday, August 6, 2009

The Selection Skill-set

I have been reading and contributing to the English Companion Ning almost since it began, and I highly recommend it to all ELA teachers. We have even been joined by social studies teachers who realize that their students have to read and write.

Today I reflected, after reading a fabulous blog post by Alan Sitomer and a response by Paul Hankins, there is very little discussion on the ning about students selecting themes, topics, novels, short stories, etc. Choosing yes; selecting no. The difference, as I see it, is that selection has a much broader palette than choice; selection, in fact, has a palette of infinite possibilities. As teachers, we feel that one of our primary responsibilities is to select topics, themes, books, exercises, projects, websites from which students must choose. This is probably because we, as adults, believe that students do have not enough experience to make Selections. This, as Hankins points out, is the iTunes model. He argues that education misses the boat by not providing students with an iTunes-like store of learning content and subject areas from which to choose. Actually, that store exists - for free - in both print (libraries) and digital (Internet) formats. The fact of the matter is that students don't use resources for learning nearly as much as envious "digital immigrants" want to believe. They do, I think, have practice in the necessary sub-skills, but not as these skills contribute to the process of Selection. By and large, as I have pointed out over the last two years, students are weak at Selection (in fact, they don't want to do it) - at least at the middle school level. It is a niggling bother in my mind that this is true.

Is it possible to ignite student to want to Select their own learning objectives and objects? Is it possible to teach Selection? How would students practice and scaffold Selection?

First, the skill set.

As a teacher seeking sources, or as a researcher, or as a purchaser (iTunes, Kindle books, Audible, Best Buy, Kids R Us...), I want to sample and review the wares. How old is this idea? As old as barter.

Think about this: by grade 3 or 4 teachers expect students ("digital natives") to be able to complete simple Google keyword searches and find fill-in-the-blank information. Plug in a keyword, click search, and get a hit list of websites. Go to the "best" site and pull out the information. In fact, these students are, after a year of practice (I would hope) learning to use the sampling tools provided to them by Google: the URL and the language of the summary. Once at a site, they use the navigation tools (named tabs, nav panel, lists) to sample content. They have also been, since grade 2 or 3, using the same sampling skill to skim textbook and reading selections for keywords and headings. This is an essential component of informational reading instruction.

To review the sources and sites, students need to follow links and be able to quickly assess their value. For print and web informational text, this is called skimming. Today's students also need and want to access other students and adults who have used the sites. The coolest thing about Web 2.0 is the way it is changing informational sites to make the review process possible; think of all those sites with 5-star ratings (still uneven and untrustworthy, but developing).

Review also comes into play when the students plays a quick mental movie reel of "What I Know" at the beginning of the Selection process. It comes when students, after reading a novel, reflect on the themes and questions raised by the book.

Joined at the hip to Review is Questioning. Jamie McKenzie has written, and continues to write, extensively about this topic. The ability to frame good questions about topic is key to the Big 6 research process, to writing Essential Questions, and to Selection itself. After all, how can you direct your own inquiry if you don't have an inquiry?

Sampling, review and questioning are information literacy skills - invaluable and teachable (ask your librarian). They are practiced, even in teacher-led classrooms, frequently. But these skills alone do not equip students to select their own learning paths.

The last skill is probably most important to Selection. It comes into play before, during and after sampling and review. I call it ownership. Think about the last time you made a list of books, topics, spelling words, facts, famous people, literary terms. Didn't you own every item on that list? If you were unsure of an item, didn't it come off the list until you felt secure about it? It is not new pedagogy to state that students need the same ownership of topic in order to Select it - and then to do a good job of learning. It is ownership that makes Selection work as a pedagogy by scaffolding information literacy toward ownership. The trouble is, ownership is hard work, and many students are not comfortable with it. It is necessary to teach students how to identify and articulate their own interests and curiosities. No, they don't do this natively. Think for a second like a middle schooler. For most of your in-school life you have been doing assignments provided by a teacher. For most of your out-of-school life you have been reacting to information put in your face by the media or copying the interests of your peers and role models. It has been easy. Now all of a sudden a teacher says, "Select something you are interested in, review it to make sure you are interested, and narrow the topic so that it is manageable in X number of days." You panic! You say, "But I am not interested in anything! Give me a list! Give me a topic!"

The condundrum for the teacher is this: Research-based pedagogy points to the importance of student-led projects founded deeply in student interest - but students today, for all of the digital resources freely available to them, live in a smaller box and a narrower tunnel than ever before. They simply are not using those resources as tools for selecting those topics that do interest them deeply. This skill has been lost due to educational practice and learning-indifferent parenting. Turning this trend around becomes the teacher's prime responsibility.

[You can stop here if you wish and go buy Comprehension & Collaboration; Inquiry Circles in Action, a new book by Stephanie Harvey and Harvey Daniels. I got it in the mail yesterday. If you want an iTunes approach to this topic, get the book. If you want to practice Selection, read on and think for yourself about applying the concepts to your classroom.]

It really is quite simple to provide Selection practice. If every research topic is intentionally as broad as it can be ("the 1920's" instead of "Fashion, technology, crime or music in the 1920's"; "a Quick Topic that interests you today" instead of "A scientist"), students will be challenged to develop a deeper understanding of where their curiosities lie. There are many ways to nudge them:
  • What was the last book or magazine article that grabbed you?
  • Write or draw 10 things that you wonder about.
  • List 3 things your parents have made you curious about.
  • List 3 things your best friend likes that you don't like.
  • If you could ask the "top god" a question, what would it be?
  • Do fish sleep? is a my question about nature. What is yours?
Next should come sampling and review and more questioning. Go to the library, go online, take the beginnings of idea home for a few days (Harvey and Daniels call this "marinating in the material" - a great way to think of it!). I would use entry passes and exit passes in my classroom at this point to add some accountability to the process. If working in groups, bring results to the group and its accountability system.

Then you need to allow time for talking about the resulting lists, topics, ideas. Ideas need to be declared with confidence. At least a full class period--generally more--needs to be spent on Selection, before any research notes or reading or planning is done. This is like the deep learning of a new vocabulary word - the word needs to be explored and used in as many ways as possible. It needs to be owned.

Sounds like a lot of prep time, doesn't it? It will be. Students do gain confidence with their ability to Select, however, and confidence speeds up the process. What is the teacher's role? You need to organize the journey. This means creating timelines, creating groups, providing organizational tools and ideas (I like Grammar Girls little video about organization), guiding projects or outcomes, being a resource for materials and marinades, nudging when necessary, listening actively, collaborating with each group. I think this is fun, for the most part. Sometime,s it seems boring because I'm not really needed in the classroom. That is the hardest part.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Aside - Online Self-Assessment Learning

In addition to reading conferences and our Smartest Generation Projects (see previous and next posts), we are doing final touches on grammar self-assessment via online exercises, which I find really push most students to an understanding of commas, apostrophes, semi-colons, and pronouns.

We are ALSO completing the online information literacy (research methods and process) assessment designed by ILILE (The Institute for Library and Information Literacy Education - Trails). The overall profile of this 8th grade will inform our librarian and ELA teachers about research skills that must be taught (eg - have been missed). Our kids are taking this seriously, even though they do not get a "score." They are asking the questions that help them to learn - like about Boolean search terms.

Why does this self-assessment thing work?

I think it works because middle school students are, in an environment that is comfortable for them, put under the microscope in one small area - and measured. Sounds terrible - and that terribleness is part of the success of the exercises. Note the key word: small. The assessments, which are often auto-graded exercises (all except for the Trails), are no more than 20 questions long. The "scoring" is instant, or at most it requires the student to self-check against a digital answer sheet. It works because students know how they measure up and how they can improve their scores. Surprise! This is the same system used by edutainment software and online curricular/intervention packages (like Plato). These systems, which I have been evaluating since forever it seems, are still in production - because they work, for many skills, for most students.

They work because a small isolated skill is assessed intelligently at a serious level. The bar is not low. Students have to work to do well. Redo's (cheating) are possible, but with the best tools another and different exercise can be taken immediately.

It is the nature of the process that students complete the exercises at different times. Teachers can therefore work 1-1 on problem skills, both during a test (I allow students who don't know an answer to ask for instruction) and after a test. For students, this is a win-win learning situation, as every student exits a skill lesson/assessment with a 90% (my standard) or better score.

It is important for the teacher to set some guidelines for students. I do this is a NoteShare notebook, which has the advantages of allowing student to get ALL of the exercises in one download, to work at home if necessary (they take screen shots to prove completion), and for me to update exercises (add, improve) on the fly (it will be necessary).

My guidelines are:
  • I provide a GOAL for students to meet in order to EXIT the exercise. It is always at least 90%, often mastery (95 or better).
  • For high-importance skills (like commas), student must complete a practice before they shoot for mastery. This allows for teaching moments - very successful.
  • Multiple exercises are available for every learning skill. This is important. If you don't master Exercise 1, you can try again in Exercise 2. Otherwise, kids will just do Exercise 1 over again (the smart ones screen shot the results too).
  • You have to show me the results (if I am grading this, as I am this year) OR you have to log your own progress (if I am not grading this, as I did last year). Frankly, I don't see any difference in the student learning outcomes, but students liked the logging-of-progress so much that I think I will return to logging rather than grading. The demonstration of learning shifts from me to student, which is healthy. It will come in handy during parent conferences too. Of course, you have to trust your students.
So what are the best tools?

It is the teacher's job to locate the best tools and send students to . I have always placed a high level of trust in Purdue's OWL. Unfortunately for me, the exercises that supported the grammar instruction part of the site are being removed, as we speak. One day students can use them, the next day they are gone. The end result is going to be a very fine tool for self-instruction, but for now it is unreliable. So I have had to scrabble.

It takes time, but generally speaking a simple Google for "____ exercises" will lead to several good exercises (apostrophe exercises). The best online exercises:
  • Focus on one specific skill
  • Provide feedback (right - wrong answers)
  • The very best tell you why an answer is correct and/or incorrect - instruct! Exercises made with Hot Potatoes tend to have this teaching feature.
  • Are correct in terms of the grammar or skills YOU teach - some exercise creators follow a different set of rules, so it is a very good idea to check the answers against what you want students to know!
Getting back to the Trails lessons (information science). The online tool meets the criteria above. I highly recommend it. Teachers should consider taking an assessment - find out what you don't know! Working students through a difficult question has been a great teaching experience for me. In a back-door way, this simple assessment has provided me with a window on how kids think through problems, not to mention a confirmation about how they read questions... I am using the individual "unit" tests for grade 9 because I took the General test myself and found it exhausting. I think that by doing 4 sub-tests of 10 questions each, our students will learn, and we will focus in on the research skills and vocabulary that are most important.

How much time does this take in my classroom: 15 minutes of 75 minutes. Big gain for good organization.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Trails - Research Process Tool (an aside)

Trails is an online information literacy assessment tool. I am using the grade 9 assessments to help the Librarian and the ELA department develop a better research skills process. The test is hard, but it's good. I recommend that teachers:
  1. create an account,
  2. create a practice group of ALL students,
  3. get logins for as many students as will be assessed,
  4. and then set up the REAL testing sessions by selecting no more than 4 of the 10-question topics,
  5. use the initial set of logins for each 10-question assessment (saves a lot of time and record-keeping).
I think these 40 questions will give us a very good overview of the online (and paper) research skills of our students. Just by taking the test, students learn what they don't know (like what an almanac is).

I recommend this tool for teachers who want to get a handle on on the non-Google approach to research. Teachers who take it will learn a bit about topic construction and research methods too...